アデサニヤ負け

������������������������������������������������ 2016�N10��21�� ���挧�̒n�k ������������������������������������������������ 1.�n�k�ɂ‚��� (Earthquake Information) ----------------------------------------------------   2016/10/21,14:07:22.572 35.3806 133.8545 11.6 6.6 ---------------------------------------------------- Table1. Earthquake information. Origin time, Epicentral latitude, longitude, depth, and JMA magnitude from the left.(ref. Hi-net catalog) Fig.1. Event location. 2.�ϑ��_���z (Station Distribution) Fig.2. Station Distribution. 3.�ً}�n�k���񔭐M�� (Earthquake Early Warning Report) -------------------------------------------------------------------   [01] 16/10/21-14:07:22 6- M6.8 35.4N 133.9E 010km (16/10/21-14:07:28)   [04] 16/10/21-14:07:22 6+ M6.8 35.4N 133.9E 010km (16/10/21-14:07:38)   [05] 16/10/21-14:07:22 6+ M6.7 35.4N 133.9E 010km (16/10/21-14:07:54)   [06] 16/10/21-14:07:22 6+ M6.7 35.4N 133.9E 010km (16/10/21-14:07:56)   [07] 16/10/21-14:07:22 6+ M6.7 35.4N 133.9E 010km (16/10/21-14:08:16)   [08] 16/10/21-14:07:22 6+ M6.7 35.4N 133.9E 010km (16/10/21-14:08:36)   [09] 16/10/21-14:07:22 6+ M6.7 35.4N 133.9E 010km (16/10/21-14:08:42)   --------------------------------------------------------------------- �i�����珇�ɏ��ԍ��C�k�����C�ő�\���k�x�C�}�O�j�`���[�h�C �k���ܓx�C�k���o�x�C�k���[���C�d�����\�����j from CEORKA ------------------------------------------------------------------- Table2. Earthquake early warning reports. Information ID, Origin time, Maximum Intensity, JMA magnitude, Epicentral latitude, longitude, depth, and time to issue the report from the left.(ref. The Committee of Earthquake Observation and Research in the Kansai Area) --> �C�ے��ɂ��ً}�n�k����̓��e 4.�ϑ��L�^ (Observed Records) Fig.3. Peak Ground Acceleration (left) and Peak Ground Velocity (right). Fig.4. JMA seismic intensity. Fig.5. Population exposure. A circle size shows the population at the town, and a circle color shows the seismic intensity at the town. Fig.6. Seismic activity of past 40 years. 5.��͌��� (Analytical Result) -------------------------------------------------------   TTR0051610211407 133.825 35.429 2.188 1.978 5.990 6.6 6.2    TTRH071610211407 133.749 35.365 1.380 2.538 9.781 6.6 5.8    OKY0151610211407 133.926 35.279 1.165 2.998 12.965 6.6 5.6    TTR0041610211407 134.055 35.461 1.606 4.078 20.240 6.6 5.9    TTRH041610211407 133.631 35.467 1.233 4.418 22.462 6.6 5.7    TTR0061610211407 133.630 35.511 1.705 4.968 24.948 6.6 6.0    OKY0011610211407 133.731 35.170 2.896 4.968 25.903 6.6 6.5    OKYH091610211407 133.676 35.181 2.498 5.278 27.443 6.6 6.3    OKY0021610211407 134.050 35.179 1.694 5.418 28.602 6.6 6.0    TTRH061610211407 134.199 35.395 1.995 5.868 31.320 6.6 6.1    Observed/Estimated Mw(median) tauc 6.6 6 1.7 ------------------------------------------------------- Table3. Analytical results using Tau_c method (Wu and Kanamori, 2005). Station ID, Station longitude, latitude, tauc, P-arrival time, epicentral distance(km) , magnitude, and estimated magnitude from the left. Fig.7. Time history of the estimates for source parameters by the IPF method (Wu et al., 2014). The error of epicenter, depth, error of origin time, JMA magnitude are shown. X-axis shows the time after the closest o'clocck sharp. --> Reference Wu, Y. M. and H. Kanamori (2005). Experiment on an onsite early warning method for the Taiwan early warning system, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 95, 347-353. Wu, S, Yamada, M., K. Tamaribuchi, and J. Beck (2014). Multi-events Earthquake Early Warning algorithm using a Bayesian approach. Geophysical Journal International. �C�ے��̐k�x���A�h�ЉȊw�Z�p��������K-NET,KiK-net�̔g�`�A�C�ے��̋��k�g�`�A�֐��n�k�ϑ��������c��̋��k�g�`�A�ꌳ���k���J�^���O���𗘗p���܂����B �ً}�n�k����𔭕\�����n�k�̉�͌��� �R�c�^���@�z�[��